Google熊猫更新:对低质量外链建设说再见

  [复制链接]
查看: 1731   回复: 11
发表于 2012-4-23 09:58:32 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
前阵子,我写了关于如何获得最大量外链的文章。随后8个月,Google对其算法进行了的两次重大改变:第一次针对垃圾/抄袭网站,然后更新到坑爹的熊猫,它针对“低质量”网站。此外,Google对JCPenney, Forbes, 和Overstock.com的黑链做法进行了惩罚。

这对于seoer意味着什么?是的,是时候集体对低质量外链建设说再见了。

“但竞争对手正在这样做”不是借口

seoer对此可能不好认同,特别是当你在进行研究时,发现竞争对手的某个关键字排名靠前是因为他们有成千上万的纯垃圾外链。

但这里有两件事你必须在分析这些大量低质量外链时考虑到:

    也许不是因为这些链接使这个竞争对手有了今天的地位,而是因为他的品牌足够大,口碑足够好使这个关键字达到这个排名。
    如果不是以上情况,那么也许只是时间问题,Google下一步就会取消这些垃圾外连的权重。



因此,让我们面对现实吧。你不想学OverStock和JCPENNEY那样建立外链而倒霉吧!

如何确定一个外链是否有价值

你怎么能确定你想获得外链的网站是有价值的?下面是一些危险标志,Google可能已经或以后会把它认作低质量网站。

大量的广告。如果该网站页面被5个AdSense广告、Kontera文本链接,或其他广告覆盖,您应该避开它。

缺乏高质量的内容。如果你提交的文章会被立即接受,估计这不是您需要的文章网站。如果这个文章网站接受仿写或写得不好的内容,根据搜索算法,google将很难看到你这篇“垃圾中的钻石”。当然,即使一个网站(例如Suite101.com)提交给编辑的过程极其困难、缓慢,也不能以此把它们作为安全的站点的标志(他们的问题可能处在ads上)。

内容很多,流量很低。一个PR为6的Blog可能看起来像一个发垃圾评论的好地方。但是如果这个Blog没有权威的外链和社交网站的分享,那么它未来很可能会被降权。 根据一些PR7或更高(包括一个PR9)网站情况,更新至熊猫时,一些网站的PR值并没有被保留。

链接泛滥。特别是Blog的评论和网站目录。如果你看一个页面上有一堆垃圾链接,你最好不要去凑热闹。除非你确定需要一个垃圾外链,那就想法加入他们的空缺吧。

你应该把你的精力集中在那里?当然是内容!

在10个机构中,有九个使用Blog,白皮书,网络研讨会,信息图表和其他高质量的内容,来建设链接、吸引自然的白链。您不仅可以使用内容建立链接,还可以通过提供的资料来证明其企业在行业中的权威。

你改变你的链接建设策略吗?

针对最近的新闻中处罚、算法的变化,你开始改变您的链接建设策略了吗?请在评论中分享您的想法
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-23 09:59:25 | 显示全部楼层
以上是一篇翻译,原文:
Google Panda Update: Say Goodbye to Low-Quality Link Building

正文
    A while back, I wrote about how to get the best high volume links. Fast forward eight months and Google has made two major changes to its algorithm -- first to target spammy/scraper sites, followed by the larger Panda update that targeted "low quality" sites. Plus, Google penalized JCPenney, Forbes, and Overstock.com for "shady" linking practices.

    What's it all mean for link builders? Well, it's time we say goodbye to low quality link building altogether.
    'But The Competitors Are Doing It' Isn't an Excuse

    This may be tough for some link builders to digest, especially if you're coming from a research standpoint and you see that competitors for a particular keyword are dominating because of their thousands upon thousands of pure spam links.

    But here are two things you must consider about finding low quality, high volume links in your analysis:

        Maybe it isn't the links that got the competitor where they are today. Maybe they are a big enough brand with a good enough reputation to be where they are for that particular keyword.
        If the above doesn't apply, then maybe it's just a matter of time before Google cracks down even further, giving no weight to those spammy backlinks.

    Because, let's face it. You don't want to be the SEO company behind the next Overstock or JCPenney link building gone wrong story!
    How to Determine a Valuable Backlink Opportunity

    How can you determine whether a site you're trying to gain a link from is valuable? Here are some "warning" signs as to what Google may have or eventually deem as a low-quality site.

        Lots of ads. If the site is covered with five blocks of AdSense, Kontera text links, or other advertising chunks, you might want to steer away from them.
        Lack of quality content. If you can get your article approved immediately, chances are this isn't the right article network for your needs. If the article network is approving spun or poorly written content, it will be hard for the algorithm to see your "diamond in the rough." Of course, when a site like Suite101.com, which has one hell of an editorial process, gets dinged, then extreme moderation may not necessarily be a sign of a safe site either (in their case, ads were the more likely issue).
        Lots of content, low traffic. A blog with a Google PageRank of 6 probably looks like a great place to spam a comment. But if that blog doesn't have good authority in terms of traffic and social sharing, then it may be put on the list of sites to be de-valued in the future. PageRank didn't save some of the sites in the Panda update, considering there are several sites with PageRank 7 and above (including a PR 9).
        Lack of moderation. Kind of goes with the above, except in this case I mean blog comments and directories. If you see a ton of spammy links on a page, you don't want yours to go next to it. Unless you consider it a spammy link, and then more power to you to join the rest of them.

    What Should You Be Doing

    Where should you focus your energy? Content, of course!

    Nine in 10 organizations use blogs, whitepapers, webinars, infographics, and other high quality content to leverage for link building and to attract natural, organic links. Not only can use your content to build links, but you can use it to build leads as well by proving the business knows their stuff when it comes to their industry.
    Have You Changed Your Link Building Strategy?

    With the recent news, penalties, and algorithm changes, have you begun to change your link building strategies? Please share your thoughts in the comments!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-4-23 10:44:57 | 显示全部楼层
虽然不想说啥,但还是忍不住吐槽:内容太老了,另外,一个页面放不了5个adsense.。。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-23 11:09:35 | 显示全部楼层
凑副看看,新手也能长点知识。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-4-23 11:19:53 | 显示全部楼层
很不错的资料。以前弄了不少垃圾外链。关键是高pr的Blog只要能发评论的,大部分都是几百成千的带链接的评论。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-4-23 13:42:55 | 显示全部楼层
你说得那几个大站,不至于做黑链吧?个个都是超有钱的公司啊。。。随便拿点地面推广的钱都够买好多链接了
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-4-23 14:02:05 | 显示全部楼层
毫无价值的帖子
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-23 17:53:28 | 显示全部楼层
毫无价值的帖子
liudezhi411 发表于 2012-4-23 14:02 Google熊猫更新:对低质量外链建设说再见



    希望你能发点有价值的
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-4-27 09:34:29 | 显示全部楼层
自动链效果不好,手动又太辛苦,买链又太费钱......
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-4-30 14:09:19 | 显示全部楼层
链接太难搞了。。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-6-18 22:35:31 | 显示全部楼层
外联太难搞了呀
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-6-19 01:48:03 | 显示全部楼层
有总比没有强吧?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则